Featured Post

In Defense of the West

When I first began this site, it was with the intention of arguing politics, evolution, and Christian apologetics, topics I found myself add...

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

The Coelacanth has a story to tell ...

A dead fish tells no tales -- unless it's extant after 100 million years.
The comments are gone, but the truth remains. Just like the Coelacanth. In reply to Marovus:

If intentionally breeding for diversity results in animals of the same species, then how can random genetic mutations create innumerable species from a first "miraculous" cell? The truth is that a quadrillion years isn't enough time for the impossible to happen. And if you disagree, then show us your evidence that those mutations which usually harm or kill an organism can create newer and more complex genetic program, structure, and function. You can't.

Consider the coelacanth, a fish of which we have fossilized remains dating back 100 million years (allegedly); it's still caught today. If a fish is basically unchanged after 100 million years, then how can Man have evolved from some ape-type creature only a million years ago? All of human experience shows that Life arises from only the same kind of Life (and its programs). You have literally no evidence for your creation myth.

 And that's why Darwinism isn't Science; it's science fiction.

ANNO DOMINI 2003-2026

the Amillennialist Contra Mundum